Yesterday I was listening to the Adam Ruins Everything podcast, specifically this episode here , and it somewhat reminded me of this post I'd seen on reddit from the University of Indiana here . The podcast referred to the " backfire effect ", which I believe really does happen when people's views are challenged. In addition to discussing the phenomenon, both Adam and his guest talk about ways online to try and combat the effect and to provide context to ideas shared online - basically to lessen the effect of trolls and such. For example, one method pointed out by the guest on the podcast was that a Norwegian news site will ask people to take a short quiz over the article that they just read before allowing them to comment. In a way, it's sort of a short test of reading comprehension. It limits people from just randomly seeing a headline and then commenting/reacting to the headline rather than reading the article. I thought it was kind of brilliant, but may not...
My way of sharing my unprofessional, half-researched, partly baked, unscientific thoughts. You're welcome to disagree.