Skip to main content

Bizarre Videos Online on YouTube targeting kids

I woke up this morning to this Reddit thread here over bizarre videos being put up on YouTube targeting kids which links to a Verge article here which in turn links to a New York Times article here and a Medium.com blog post here over the matter.

I decided to write 60 Minutes to see if they would do a story on this. Below is what I wrote:

----

To 60 Minutes,

I was wondering if you would produce a story on inappropriate videos being targeted toward children on social media sites, specifically on YouTube. There was a recent The Verge article here that gives links to other articles here (Medium.com) and here (New York Times) that give an overview over this phenomenon.

Given this, it stills seems that while YouTube claims that they will be working on improving this problem, it seems that simply just flagging the videos still does no good or re-writing algorithms. There was a recent Reddit thread here that discusses the problem, and a few of the commenters have pointed out that it’s not in YouTube’s interest to take down content for fear of angering advertisers and generating revenue. The problem as described by other comments on the thread explains that kids will search for anything that is slightly deviant, i.e “fart” or “bad” to watch behind their parents back; and because these videos are brought up by the search algorithm, it yields more revenue generated because of all the views; which then just feeds back into the algorithm for more views or highly viewed videos.

As an example of strange videos or videos that have some sort of fetish undertones, see here (strange behavior) and  (NOTE: NOT Really Safe For Work) here.

There’s an entire Reddit dedicated to this here for “Elsa” videos; where popular characters are re-done in videos showing performing bizarre or strange behavior.

While I am personally all for freedom of speech and information online; public entities like YouTube can and should do a better job of flagging and keeping this information away from children. And it should be noted that parents can and always should take an active role in filtering content for their kids. Technology should not be a substitute for good parenting.

Thank you for taking the time to read this email,

[ BLANK] 
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Protesting and Kneeling during the National Anthem

(Note: I did this as a Facebook post; I'm just re-posting here for historical reasons.) I’m going to go ahead and note right off that you and I are probably not going to see eye to eye on this issue. That’s okay; I’ve no intention of trying to “win” a discussion or anything; only to share concerns and thoughts. Civilized discussion I feel has really taken a turn for the worst lately, and I’d like to try and make effort and be civilized especially given the strong emotions both sides have on the issue. To my actual concerns: I empathize with the feeling that people have about the National Anthem; the actions of sacrifice. I do. I don’t think anyone who is protesting and kneeling has any intent of trivializing the men and women who’ve served. I’ve shared an article on my wall that gives the side of Kaep and Reid on why they started what they started. Here’s the thing about protesting: the intent is to cause people to take notice. People protest in all sorts of ways and in all s...
Post a Comment
Read more

FCC and Net Neutrality

The FCC announced today that they would be reversing their decision on Net Neutrality, which to me personally is a big deal. This decision will take place on December 14th, 2018. Note: This post has been edited. News Rollup NYT Article here and WP article here The Oatmeal has a link here  http://theoatmeal.com/blog/net_neutrality Why Does This Matter John Oliver has done a couple of episodes on Net Neutrality here , here , and here .  If you want another source, the ACLU has a link here that explains the details as well as PBS here . I'll offer my own explanation here: Net Neutrality is the idea that you should be able to access content on the internet equally - at the same speed and quality, regardless of the content you are viewing. This means in practice that you can visit YouTube at the same speed and quality as when you're visiting JoeBobsBlog.com; regardless of the content you're viewing, you get it at the same speed and quality. Revoking N...
Post a Comment
Read more